🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear the manager could survive defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final against a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to engage. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for losing individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated to be among football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that the club's competitors are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Regarding Formation & Philosophy

For example, this was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas met a certain resistance. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when issued from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as him – simply operate on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being ready to receive.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt analytics and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style to football “will be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Whom else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

A Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to go into a club and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys established? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire a coach who can tailor their methods to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged while the people who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the system coach and then fire him for using excessively that system. Hire the project manager and then discard them for taking too long. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.